New Delhi - Taj Mahal Hotel

Spring 2008
Frank's view
'all that is bad about complacent, big city, 'business' hotels

The Taj Group has some good hotels around India, the best being the Rambagh Palace in Jaipur, but the Taj Mahal Delhi is not one of them.

Our suite was grubby.  The worn out carpet was probably from an old dog bed and the control unit for the Air Conditioning was untouchably filthy.
 
The bathroom was tiny, made to look larger by mirrors, but the usable floor space was barely 4ft x 5 ft, and less when the door was opened. The plastic urine sample pot by the bath was presumably for hair rinsing, in the absence of a hand spray.

Just in case you think I am unduly whinging, this crown palace of a suite cost 56,000 rupees a night; that’s £700 0r US$1500.  They did leave a complementary bottle of wine in the room.  Whilst browsing the hotel wine list I noticed that this generous gesture, at 1375 rupees, was one of the cheapest wines on offer.  You really had to pay 3000 rupees + for anything half decent.

On the subject of wine, there were some extraordinary anomalies in the champagne section, with Bollinger, a relative bargain at 4,500 rupees compared to Mumm Cordon Rouge at 5,000 rupees and Pol Roger, 5500 rupees.  The real deal seemed to be Laurent Perrier at a mere 3100 rupees.  Now that would have been appreciated as a pre dinner aperitif in our suite.

We dined in the hotel’s ‘House of Ming’.  The better restaurants in Delhi all seem to be in the larger hotels.  Modestly described as ‘the premiere Chinese restaurant in the city’, it was good and packed with locals.

Breakfast, however, was disappointing, with the quality of juices and food generally not of the same standard as other Taj hotels.

The swimming pool was large and well run, with endless complementary bottled water.

The Taj Mahal Delhi is a typical big city business hotel charging over inflated prices.  I suspect the bills are normally paid by companies so the guests aren’t too discerning.  The hotel clearly enjoys high occupancy and, as a result, has become sloppy.  It just doesn’t have to try too hard to get the business and it shows.

Subsequently, I’ve been informed that The Imperial is a much better hotel.  I didn’t visit it, let alone stay there, but from the web site, it seems worth a look.

As for the Taj Mahal – AVOID!


Taj Mahal Hotel
1 Mansingh Road
New Delhi

+91 11 23026

http://tajhotels.com/

"The air-conditioning unit was untouchably filthy..."

"the worn out carpet was probably from an old dog bed"



Be Frank: agree or disagree? What do you think?

Bookmark and Share

Home

What's New          This Week


Read More

 

  twitter link

 

  twitter link

 

FREE Newsletter

Sign up for the the latest travel news, reviews and updates

Click here now!

 

The Camel Archive

Read some of our recent items from the archive

Read More

 

Camel Comments

London - Roka
"the extremely rapid service creates the feeling of being in a very expensive fast food joint"


New York - The Iroquois Hotel
"For the little folks of Lilliput, the shoe box size rooms may be perfect".


Bangkok - Lebua State Tower
" incredible views and fabulous night life"


London - Mon Plaisir
'this is the only room in which this camel will dine'


London - Sanderson
'The contrast between exterior and interior is shocking'


British Airways
'who colour co-ordinated the navy sleepsuits with brown trim?'


Miami - Mandarin Oriental
"As we approached the Mandarin Oriental in Miami, the camel had a hissy spitty fit with itself."


Bruton - At The Chapel
"Whilst the pomp and splendour offered much promise, the sermon failed to deliver."


Jakarta - Mandarin Oriental
"Perhaps I wasn’t really staying in a drab, run down hotel, with a stale reputation from days long gone….".






All photography and reviews are owned by frankcamel.com except where stated. For permission to reproduce any content please contact us.